You are responsible for your behaviour, I’m responsible for how I react to your behaviour. If we’re both happy with our interaction, it’s a win-win for everybody. However, if one of the people involved is not happy with the other person’s behaviour, that’s when something has to change. The personalities and the relationship between the people involved will determine what those changes will be, but in every case, they’ll fall into two categories, which are direct and indirect.

Direct changes
Direct changes are the quickest and easiest way to resolve any difference of opinion about a person’s behaviour. The person with the grievance outlines how the other person’s behaviour offended them and then gives the other person a chance to respond. The response will determine the future relationship between the two people.
Indirect changes
Indirect changes, on the other hand, can last an eternity. Neither person confronts the other about the behaviour that offends them, so they just alter their own behaviour. “I can’t believe they did or said that” are common phrases in this scenario. However, they say it to other people instead of each other. Of course, one of the people involved may have no idea their behaviour offended the other person and is wondering why the other person has changed.
I don’t know for definite which category is most used but if I was a gambler I’d be putting my money on the indirect changes method, simply because people are complicated and the like to make everything complicated too. I’ll leave you with one final thought.
To be happy with your behaviour is enough because it’s impossible to please everybody.
P.S. To say this post is only the tip of the iceberg on this subject is an under statement.




